Compliance with law and compliance with policy and procedure are relatively easy to establish. But compliance with ethics?
“Journal Reporter Fired Over Ethics,” The Wall Street Journal, June 22, 2017 A2. A foreign affairs reporter at The Wall Street Journal was fired for something related to “his dealings with an aviation tycoon whom he had cultivated as a source.” Further details weren’t provided. It may have been the offer from the tycoon of a share in one of his companies. Perhaps he wasn’t totally honest with the paper about something (but we don’t know what, yet). A violation of journalistic ethics?
All this may have been revealed following a hack of email or text messages, or both.
Seems a bit squishy without more details as to what were the ethics and what was the violation. Were I a reporter for the paper, I’d be curious what the lines were and how were they crossed. This perhaps goes beyond the common stricture of “Don’t lie, cheat, or steal.”
Were this a corporate exec or a governmental official, would we get more detail? Who checks the checkers?
Corporations get charged with criminal conduct from time to time. But seldom does the CEO at the time also get charged.
“Barclays Hit With Fraud Charges,” The Wall Street Journal, June 21, 2017 B1. Charges of fraud and illegal payments filed against the bank and its former CEO (and a few other executives) in the UK.
As usual, the shareholders get the bill for any fines (and any diminution in share value). Curiously absent were any charges against the directors of the Bank’s Board at the time. But maybe the failure of the Board to detect this level of criminal activity will result in civil suits against the directors for negligent supervision.
Maybe Shearman & Stirling can write another report. (See Wells Fargo posts, supra). Willie Sutton wasn’t the only crook who knew where the money is/was.
Filed under Board, Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Directors, Duty, Duty of Care, Employees, Governance, Internal controls, Oversight, Oversight, Protect assets, Risk assessment, Supervision
Where do you start if you want to pierce a corporation’s cybersecurity protections? The CEO.
“Goldman, Citi Bosses Duped by Email Prankster,” The Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2017 B11. Although nothing confidential was leaked, the CEOs bought into phishing emails.
Hard to blame the Chief Information Security Officer. One assumes there’s a policy in place, but can you write a policy to protect against this? Who else in the corporation isn’t following the existing policy? How do you fix? Two-factor authentication for every email to/from a senior exec? Encryption?
Filed under Access, Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Duty of Care, Employees, Governance, Internal controls, IT, Management, Policy, Security
Last July, after the July 5 new conference, I wrote about the consequences of James Comey’s decision not to prosecute, https://infogovnuggets.com/2016/07/12/sounds-of-silence/. I view that as The Day Information Governance Died.
This week, we had the sequel.
If you create a document in the normal course of your duties for your employer, about a conversation held in the course of your employer’s business, using the employer’s computer, then that document is the property of your employer. It’s “proprietary.” You can’t take that document with you when you’re fired and then give it to others. Even if it doesn’t contain privileged information. Or your purported recollections of a conversation in your official capacity with the President, subject to executive privilege.
But Mr. Comey seems to be above (or maybe beside) the Law, generally. And he is (until the ethics people get a hold of this) a lawyer.
“The ‘Close Friend’ Behind Memo Leak,” The Wall Street Journal, June 9, 2017 A4. Comey leaks a memo he wrote while a government employee to a friend, in order to leak it to the press.
And we wonder why we have a hard time getting traction on information governance.
How do you deal with claims of sexual harassment? Have two law firms conduct investigations and fire 20 people. But will that be the end or the middle?
“Uber Fires Over 20 In Wake Of Probe,” The Wall Street Journal, June 7, 2017 B1. Over two hundred claims investigated and no action taken in 100 of them.
Were there supervisors who participated or condoned or who failed to notice or respond? Were there reporting practices and policies in place? If harassment was “accepted” in the Uber culture, who’s to blame? HR? The Board? Management? How long had this been going on? How much will the shareholders have to pay?
A summary of one of the law firm reports is due out soon.
Filed under Board, Compliance, Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Culture, Culture, Duty, Employees, Governance, Internal controls, Management, Oversight, Oversight
What do you do when you discover who violated the law by leaking a classified document? You arrest them.
“Contractor Charged in Leak,” The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2017 A4. Reality Winner, an employee of a contractor for the NSA, was arrested and charged for leaking a classified document to the news media. A criminal offense.
Interesting story of how the government found out. A news agency provided a copy of the document and requested the government to confirm its accuracy. The government could tell from looking at the copy that it had been folded, and concluded someone printed it out and sneaked it out. IT logs showed six people had printed it out. The computer of one of them showed email contact with a news agency. When questioned, Ms. Winner fessed up.
Common themes: the NSA needs to watch the employees of its contractors carefully; IT has a record, somewhere; criminals get arrested; a newspaper can inadvertently disclose confidential sources.
Filed under Access, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Employees, Governance, Government, Information, Internal controls, IT, Oversight, Ownership, Protect assets, Security, Third parties, Vendors
One might suppose accountability and responsibility apply to CEOs. Then, again ….
“Gymnastics Boss Paid Severance,” The Wall Street Journal, June 3, 2017 A9. The CEO, who was nominally in charge when the team doctor for the women’s gymnastics team allegedly abused female gymnasts, gets a $1 million severance package.
One wonders what the Board would have paid him if they fired him for cause. The gymnastics federation reportedly sat on the results of an internal investigation of the sexual abuse allegations for five weeks. The CEO said the federation didn’t have an obligation to report sexual abuse by its coaches to law enforcement. Didn’t the ex-president of Penn State just get sentenced to jail for similar acts or omissions?
One of the Board’s fundamental jobs is to hire the CEO; another is oversight. Everyone has a duty to report violations of law. It would appear either the Board or the CEO or the Federation wasn’t doing its or his job. Maybe the Board gets severance, too. What do the shareholders get?
Filed under Board, Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Directors, Duty, Duty of Care, Employees, Governance, Internal controls, Oversight, Oversight, To report