“Wall Street Analysts Are Selling More Data,” The Wall Street Journal, November 8, 2018 B11. Analysts are searching and make available a bunch of information on your information, including “social media sentiment … and geospatial mapping.” Think of it as expanded research reports.
Well, they are in the business of reviewing data and offering opinions (for a price). Is it much of a disintermediation for them to start selling the information directly? I guess there’s money in it. Or service.
Filed under Access, Analytics, Collect, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Information, IT, Management, Operations, Ownership, Security, Third parties, Use, Use, Value
“Technology Puts Pinch on Oil Smuggling,” The Wall Street Journal, November 2, 2018 B6. Smugglers of Iranian crude will be challenged by satellites and big data.
Smugglers had in the past “hid” their ships, but that will now be harder. Certain companies find a business opportunity in helping to track these vessels.
What controls do you need to have in place to make sure your policies are followed? How have people tried to avoid your controls? How did you/will you respond? Is there a market opportunity for others to help you enforce compliance by collecting other information?
“Alternative Data Is Valued on Wall Street,”The Wall Street Journal, November 2, 2018 B1. Companies mine different types of available information to help traders.
Is information is worth so much, won’t someone start a business to provide it? Apparently. What should you be monitoring to understand how your customers make their purchasing decisions, or what your competitors are doing?
Drones looking at parking lots and where are the iPhones coming from and going to and how many construction permits were issued? What’s your metric? How do you measure it?
What happens when you have to disclose your secret sauce?
“13 Secret Steps for Harvard Admission — They May Not Help,” The Wall Street Journal, October 29, 2018 A1. Analysis of admissions data shows what affects (helps, hurts) your chances of admission.
If you were Harvard, would you want to keep this secret, to prevent people from gaming the system? If you were an applicant, wouldn’t you want to know?
Certainly, this is Information, but to what is it relevant? Can you use it effectively, or is it just interesting? What’s it worth to you?
From a Governance perspective, did Harvard have sufficient controls in place to prevent both the violation of law and the appearance thereof? We’ll see.
This blog explores, from time to time, the outer reaches of the intersection(s) of Information, Governance, and Compliance.
Consider, for a moment, a fingerprint. Not what you normally consider “information.” And one seldom thinks of “managing” a fingerprint. Who owns your fingerprint? But consider the value of a fingerprint, and both the failure to “manage” or control where that fingerprint can be found and the ability to find that fingerprint and locate its owner. How much information governance is involved in this process?
“Fingerprint Leads to Arrest Of Bomb Suspect in Florida,” The Wall Street Journal, October 27, 2018 A1. Alleged mail bomber’s fingerprint in a package sent to a legislator leads to arrest of suspect.
Which leads me to the question,”What is there that isn’t information that is managed or controlled in our lives, or a least directly related to information that is managed?” I struggle to find an example of something that isn’t information, or directly related (perhaps somewhat remotely) to information that is managed or controlled.
Filed under Access, Accuracy, Analytics, Collect, Compliance, Controls, Data quality, Definition, Duty of Care, Governance, Information, Management, Oversight, Ownership, Records Management, Risk assessment, Use, Value
“Apple CEO Urges Action on Data Misuse,” The Wall Street Journal, October 25, 2018 B1. Tim Cook wants GDPR-style privacy protections in the US. Claims “[o]ur own information … is being weaponized against us with military efficiency.”
He went on to suggest that the data collection practices of some online advertising companies are the equivalent of government surveillance.
How do we wrest control of our information back again? Or is privacy dead? And do we believe that our federal legislature is competent to develop the necessary (and effective) legal controls and protections that true Governance requires?
Filed under Access, Accuracy, Analytics, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Duty of Care, Governance, Government, Information, Oversight, Ownership, Ownership, Policy, Privacy, Technology, Third parties, Value
How is the data in that report collected? What’s included and what’s not? Do you know?
“In Crime Data, FBI Has to Fill In Missing Pieces,” The Wall Street Journal, October 20, 2018 A2. To make unified national crime estimates, the FBI fills in some gaps in the data it receives from the states. Because it follows a method developed fifty years ago.
Discrepancies run from 2.8% to 68%, per state.