Category Archives: Ownership

What would Microsoft say?

“In China, Live Surveillance Feeds Are the New Entertainment,” The Wall Street Journal, August 11, 2017 A6.  Apparently, the data feeds from surveillance cameras are available on the internet, and have now been collected and edited into a movie.

Are you a person of interest?

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Access, Controls, Information, Ownership, Third parties, Uncategorized

David and Goliath fighting over your data

“LinkedIn Suffers Defeat in Data Case,” The Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2017 B3.  A data mining company was scraping the public information posted by employees on LinkedIn and predicting when employees would leave.  Microsoft, who now owns LinkedIn, sued to block the data mining company from accessing the site and lost its request for an injunction.

Apparently, Microsoft doesn’t own the publicly available information posted by third parties.

Leave a comment

Filed under Access, Controls, Information, Ownership, Third parties

Catching up

I was working on another project, and could not do my postings as timely as I would like.  But here’s a bunch of news items I wanted to write about:

Leave a comment

Filed under Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Directors, Duty, Duty of Care, Employees, Governance, Lawyers, Oversight, Ownership, Privacy, Third parties, Uncategorized

The grip on your information

“Apple Eases Its Grip in Chinese Data,” The Wall Street Journal, July 13, 2017 B3.  “To comply with tough new cybersecurity rules, Apple will begin storing all cloud data for its Chinese customers with a government owned company [in China] ….”  Apple “will retain control over encryption keys.”  That makes me much more comfortable.

It might appear that China is exerting its grip on the data stored by Chinese customers on iCloud.  But whose data is it, anyway?  And what if other countries take similar steps with their citizens’ data?  Any opportunity for mischief?

Leave a comment

Filed under Access, Controls, Information, Internal controls, IT, Ownership, Privacy, Security, Third parties

The Day that Information Governance Died, the Sequel

Last July, after the July 5 new conference, I wrote about the consequences of James Comey’s decision not to prosecute, https://infogovnuggets.com/2016/07/12/sounds-of-silence/.  I view that as The Day Information Governance Died.

This week, we had the sequel.

If you create a document in the normal course of your duties for your employer, about a conversation held in the course of your employer’s business, using the employer’s computer, then that document is the property of your employer.  It’s “proprietary.”  You can’t take that document with you when you’re fired and then give it to others.  Even if it doesn’t contain privileged information.  Or your purported recollections of a conversation in your official capacity with the President, subject to executive privilege.

But Mr. Comey seems to be above (or maybe beside) the Law, generally.  And he is (until the ethics people get a hold of this) a lawyer.

“The ‘Close Friend’ Behind Memo Leak,” The Wall Street Journal, June 9, 2017 A4.   Comey leaks a memo he wrote while a government employee to a friend, in order to leak it to the press.

And we wonder why we have a hard time getting traction on information governance.

Leave a comment

Filed under Controls, Duty, Employees, Information, Internal controls, Lawyers, Ownership, Privilege, Third parties

We have a Winner

What do you do when you discover who violated the law by leaking a classified document?  You arrest them.

“Contractor Charged in Leak,” The Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2017 A4.  Reality Winner, an employee of a contractor for the NSA, was arrested and charged for leaking a classified document to the news media.  A criminal offense.

Interesting story of how the government found out.  A news agency provided a copy of the document and requested the government to confirm its accuracy.  The government could tell from looking at the copy that it had been folded, and concluded someone printed it out and sneaked it out.  IT logs showed six people had printed it out.  The computer of one of them showed email contact with a news agency.  When questioned, Ms. Winner fessed up.

Common themes:  the NSA needs to watch the employees of its contractors carefully; IT has a record, somewhere; criminals get arrested; a newspaper can inadvertently disclose confidential sources.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Access, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Employees, Governance, Government, Information, Internal controls, IT, Oversight, Ownership, Protect assets, Security, Third parties, Vendors

The self-governing company

Uber fired the executive at the heart of the dispute with Google over self-driving cars.  The exec failed to meet a deadline to comply with a court order to turn over documents in a trade secret case over self-driving cars. “Uber Fires Executive At Center Of Suit,” The Wall Street Journal, May 31, 2017 A1.

Lesson?  If you hire an employee from a competitor and he’s accused of stealing his former employer’s trade secrets, try your best to look good.

What’s your process for keeping new employees, especially from competitors, from damaging your business and your reputation by bringing in your competitor’s trade secrets?  Did you follow it, or is it just there for show?

Leave a comment

Filed under Communications, Compliance, Controls, Corporation, Duty, Employees, Governance, Information, Internal controls, Management, Managers, Oversight, Ownership, Policy, Protect, Third parties, Value