News alert: Countries have different laws.
“Malaysia Aims at ‘Fake News,'” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2018 A6. In the run-up to national elections, new law proposed to impose a prison sentence of up to 10 years for spreading fake news.
As information governance, this has some interesting elements. News that hasn’t been approved by Malaysian authorities will be considered “false.” What controls does your country or company put on the sharing of information? Are they enforced? Effective?
This law may also apply to “media organizations” outside Malaysia in certain circumstances. But “the government wouldn’t suppress opposing views.” Well, that makes us comfortable.
I don’t know what the record is for consecutive days on which one company’s screw-up was on the front page of The Wall Street Journal, but Facebook is in the running.
“U.S., States Step Up Pressure on Facebook,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2018 A1. “[F]ederal regulators [including the FTC] … and 37 state attorneys general demanding explanations for [Facebook’s privacy] practices.” Stock price up 0.4% (when the market was up 669.40 points). Demands/invitations that Zuckerberg (and Google and Twitter) testify before Congress. And Europe hasn’t weighted in yet.
There is also a pop-up that describes FB’s practice of logging some calls and texts from Android phones. Did you (we) know that? Do you know what companies are doing with “your” data? Do you care? Privacy is dead; Facebook investigated as person of interest.
I guess that answers the question of who’s in charge: the Feds and the states. I guess I missed the outrage when essentially the same data was collected and used quite effectively by the Obama campaign.
Filed under Compliance, Compliance (General), Controls, Corporation, Duty, Duty of Care, Governance, Government, Information, Internal controls, Legal, Oversight, Ownership, Privacy, Protect assets, Requirements, Third parties, Vendors, Who is in charge?
Sometimes, the federal government and state governments clash over who controls some activity. For example, marijuana, the sale or distribution of which is prohibited by federal law. But some states have “legalized” it. There’s a supremacy clause in the Constitution (Article VI), as well as the Tenth Amendment, and people disagree which applies, and when.
“Fight Over Student Loans Intensifies,” The Wall Street Journal, March 10, 2018 A4. Federal government asserts sole authority over companies that collect federal student loans. States object.
What does this have to do with information governance? Don’t you need to know who make the rules that you need to comply with?