Unintended consequences

“Devices for Gun Safety Get Caught in Online Ad Bans,” The Wall Street Journal, February 6, 2019 A3.  Facebook and Google ban ads for guns, including ads for devices to improve gun safety.

Can a public platform decide what ads to accept and what ads to reject?  Who controls that decision?  If you’re a public forum, what are the implications if you restrict some legal speech?  Who governs that decision?  Just your shareholders?  Where else will people get this information?

So, Information (anything related to guns) and Governance (Who makes and enforces the rules, and controls the content, in a public forum with huge market power?).

Leave a comment

Filed under Theme One: Information, Theme Two: Governance

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s