Why corporations have policies

Corporations are potentially liable for any violation of law by corporate employees committed in the course of the corporations’ business.  There are so many applicable laws that the employees can’t know the details of them all.  So the corporations establish policies that, if followed, reduce the risks of the employees inadvertently violating the law.

“State Department Watchdog Chastises Clinton On Email,” The Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2016 A1.  Inspector General report on Hillary Clinton’s violation of State Department policies on emails.

The State Department policies were in place for security reasons and to avoid inadvertent violations of the Freedom of Information Act and the various record retention requirements applicable to the federal government.  But for those policies to work, the employees would have had to follow them.

And what are the chances that other employees at the State Department complied with those policies?  Or other policies the State Department had in place?  Is it better now?

Who had the duty to confirm that the policies were being followed?  What’s happened to them?

Leave a comment

Filed under Board, Business Case, Compliance, Compliance, Compliance, Controls, Culture, Culture, Directors, Duty, Duty of Care, Employees, Governance, Internal controls, IT, Management, Oversight, Ownership, Policy, Requirements, Risk, Security

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s