Is a fish a tangible object?

One of the drivers of some aspects of information governance is 18 USC 1519, a provision of the Federal criminal law dealing with obstruction of justice. The provision was added by Sarbanes Oxley.

A fisherman gets prosecuted under this law and his conviction turns upon whether his disposal of a fish equaled the destruction of a document or other tangible object to influence a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the US government.

Is this what Congress either said or meant?

“Prosecutors Used Sarbanes-Oxley to Hook a Fisherman,” Wall Street Journal, April 28, 2014, online.

Had it been a gun, an easier question. But a living or dead animal?

Leave a comment

Filed under Compliance, Definition, Risk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s