Radical approach to compensating brokers

I have long been a proponent of making employees bonuses subject to a deduction if the employee is found not to have complied with company policies.  I haven’t had a lot of luck securing executive buy-in.

Now one company (whose reputation has suffered some dings for compliance issues of late) is doing precisely that.  Hip, Hip, Hooray!

“Barclays Advisers’ New Performance Metric: Their Behavior,” Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2014 C1 http://on.wsj.com/1g35QH4.  Apparently, the new policy has caused some of the employees to look somewhere else for a job.  Sounds like the policy is working.  I don’t understand why this isn’t a separate factor in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual.  How could a company be serious about compliance with law or policy if it didn’t have such a deduction? Recruiters in the field say that “they don’t expect other brokerages to follow suit.”  What does that say about the cultures at those brokerages?  Or their commitment to compliance?

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Business Case, Compliance, Controls, Culture, Governance, Internal controls, Risk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s