The court says “Stuff happens.”

Your lawyer has sloppy systems that results in the leak of evidence that allows you to obtain a copy of a super-confidential license between two of your bitter rivals.  The court says “Oh, well,” or words to that effect.  But imposes stronger controls on your future distribution of redacted copies in the remaining pending cases among the parties.

Aren’t you glad it wasn’t your information that the law firm leaked?  Then the court would have really cracked down.

“Firm Gets a Break,” Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2014 B4  Samsung, Apple, and Nokia.

Is your lawyer’s malpractice insurer equally charitable?


Leave a comment

Filed under Business Case, Controls, Discovery, Information, IT, Legal, Ownership, Risk, Security, Third parties, Value

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s