Can information be too perfect?

“The Calls That Replay Won’t Fix,” Wall Street Journal, September 18, 2013 D6

Assuming that on average that an umpire’s call of a ball or a strike is wrong 8% of the time, could technology provide a more accurate result?  Would that spoil or improve the game?

Does this go to the opinion = information point? And the opinion is worth more than the information?

Are there other times where perfect information isn’t worth it, even if the price is the same or lower?  Do we admit that sometimes there’s a higher value of less-than-perfect information? When?


Leave a comment

Filed under Data quality, Use, Value

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s